SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1908.03790

Towards Online Observability-Aware Trajectory Optimization for Landmark-based Estimators

Abstract

As autonomous systems increasingly rely on onboard sensing for localization and perception, the parallel tasks of motion planning and state estimation become more strongly coupled. This coupling is well-captured by augmenting the planning objective with a posterior-covariance penalty -- however, prediction of the estimator covariance is challenging when the observation model depends on unknown landmarks, as is the case in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). This paper addresses these challenges in the case of landmark- and SLAM-based estimators, enabling efficient prediction (and ultimately minimization) of this performance metric. First, we provide an interval-based filtering approximation of the SLAM inference process which allows for recursive propagation of the ego-covariance while avoiding the quadratic complexity of explicitly tracking landmark uncertainty. Secondly, we introduce a Lie-derivative measurement bundling scheme that simplifies the recursive "bundled" update, representing significant computational savings for high-rate sensors such as cameras. Finally, we identify a large class of measurement models (which includes orthographic camera projection) for which the contributions from each landmark can be directly combined, making evaluation of the information gained at each timestep (nearly) independent of the number of landmarks. This also enables the generalization from finite sets of landmarks $\{\ell^{(n)} \}$ to distributions, foregoing the need for fully-specified linearization points at planning time and allowing for new landmarks to be anticipated. Taken together, these contributions allow SLAM performance to be accurately and efficiently predicted, paving the way for online, observability-aware trajectory optimization in unknown space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kristoffer M. Frey, Ted J. Steiner, Jonathan P. How. 2019-08-10. Towards Online Observability-Aware Trajectory Optimization for Landmark-based Estimators. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03790

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO