Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1909.04183

Stochastic Control of Tolman-Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse of Zero-Pressure Stars to Black Holes: Rigorous Criteria for Density Bounds and Singularity Smoothing

Steven D Miller
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Tolman-Oppenheimer-Snyder description gives exact analytical solutions for an Einstein-matter system describing total gravitational collapse of a zero-pressure perfect-fluid sphere, representing a massive star which has exhausted its nuclear fuel. The star collapses to a point of infinite density within a finite comoving proper time interval $[0,t_{*}]$, and the exterior metric matches the Schwarzchild black hole metric. The description is re-expressed in terms of a 'density function' $u(t)=(\rho(t)/\rho_{o}))^{1/3}=R^{-1}(t)$ for initial density $u_{0}=R^{-1}(0)=1$ and radius $R(0)$, whereby the general-relativistic formulation reduces to an autonomous nonlinear ODE for $u(t)$. The solution blows up or is singular at $t=t_{*}=\pi/2(8\pi G/3\rho_{o})^{1/2}$. The blowup interval $[0,t_{*}]$ is partitioned into domains $[0,t_{\epsilon}]\bigcup[t_{\epsilon},t_{*}]$,with $t_{*}=t_{\epsilon}+|\epsilon|$ and $|\epsilon|\ll 1$, so that $t_{\epsilon}$ can be infinitesimally close to $t_{*}$. Randomness or 'stochastic control' is introduced via the 'switching on' of specific (white-noise) perturbations at $t=t_{\epsilon}$. Hybrid nonlinear ODES-SDES are then 'engineered' over the partition. Within the Ito interpretation, the resulting density function diffusion $\overline{u(t)}$ is proved to be a martingale whose supremum, volatility and higher-order moments are finite, bounded and singularity free for all finite $t>t_{\epsilon}$. The collapse is (comovingly) eternal but never becomes singular. Extensive and rigorous boundedness and no-blowup criteria are established via various methods, and blowup probability is always zero. The density singularity is therefore smoothed or 'noise-suppressed'. Within the Stratanovitch interpretation, the singularity formation probability is unity; however, null recurrence ensures the expected comoving time for this to occur is now infinite.

Explore related subjects

math-phgr-qcmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Steven D Miller. 2019-09-09. Stochastic Control of Tolman-Oppenheimer-Snyder Collapse of Zero-Pressure Stars to Black Holes: Rigorous Criteria for Density Bounds and Singularity Smoothing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04183

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗