SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1909.06892

TiM-DNN: Ternary in-Memory accelerator for Deep Neural Networks

Abstract

The use of lower precision has emerged as a popular technique to optimize the compute and storage requirements of complex Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). In the quest for lower precision, recent studies have shown that ternary DNNs (which represent weights and activations by signed ternary values) represent a promising sweet spot, achieving accuracy close to full-precision networks on complex tasks. We propose TiM-DNN, a programmable in-memory accelerator that is specifically designed to execute ternary DNNs. TiM-DNN supports various ternary representations including unweighted {-1,0,1}, symmetric weighted {-a,0,a}, and asymmetric weighted {-a,0,b} ternary systems. The building blocks of TiM-DNN are TiM tiles -- specialized memory arrays that perform massively parallel signed ternary vector-matrix multiplications with a single access. TiM tiles are in turn composed of Ternary Processing Cells (TPCs), bit-cells that function as both ternary storage units and signed ternary multiplication units. We evaluate an implementation of TiM-DNN in 32nm technology using an architectural simulator calibrated with SPICE simulations and RTL synthesis. We evaluate TiM-DNN across a suite of state-of-the-art DNN benchmarks including both deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks. A 32-tile instance of TiM-DNN achieves a peak performance of 114 TOPs/s, consumes 0.9W power, and occupies 1.96mm2 chip area, representing a 300X and 388X improvement in TOPS/W and TOPS/mm2, respectively, compared to an NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. In comparison to specialized DNN accelerators, TiM-DNN achieves 55X-240X and 160X-291X improvement in TOPS/W and TOPS/mm2, respectively. Finally, when compared to a well-optimized near-memory accelerator for ternary DNNs, TiM-DNN demonstrates 3.9x-4.7x improvement in system-level energy and 3.2x-4.2x speedup, underscoring the potential of in-memory computing for ternary DNNs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shubham Jain, Sumeet Kumar Gupta, Anand Raghunathan. 2019-09-15. TiM-DNN: Ternary in-Memory accelerator for Deep Neural Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06892

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG