Preprocessing and Cutting Planes with Conflict Graphs

Samuel S. Brito; Haroldo G. Santos

doi:10.1016/j.cor.2020.105176

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1909.07780

Preprocessing and Cutting Planes with Conflict Graphs

Samuel S. Brito·Haroldo G. Santos

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper addresses the development of conflict graph-based algorithms and data structures into the COIN-OR Branch-and-Cut (CBC) solver, including: $(i)$ an efficient infrastructure for the construction and manipulation of conflict graphs; $(ii)$ a preprocessing routine based on a clique strengthening scheme that can both reduce the number of constraints and produce stronger formulations; $(iii)$ a clique cut separator capable of obtaining dual bounds at the root node LP relaxation that are $19.65\%$ stronger than those provided by the equivalent cut generator of a state-of-the-art commercial solver, $3.62$ times better than those attained by the clique cut separator of the GLPK solver and $4.22$ times stronger than the dual bounds obtained by the clique separation routine of the COIN-OR Cut Generation Library; and $(iv)$ an odd-cycle cut separator with a new lifting module to produce valid odd-wheel inequalities. The average gap closed by this new version of CBC was up to four times better than its previous version. Moreover, the number of mixed-integer programs solved by CBC in a time limit of three hours was increased by $23.53\%$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Samuel S. Brito, Haroldo G. Santos. 2021-01-11. Preprocessing and Cutting Planes with Conflict Graphs. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105176

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗