SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1910.08396

A "right" path to cyclic polygons

Abstract

It is well known that Heron's theorem provides an explicit formula for the area of a triangle, as a symmetric function of the lengths of its sides. It has been extended by Brahmagupta to quadrilaterals inscribed in a circle (cyclic quadrilaterals). A natural problem is trying to further generalize the result to cyclic polygons with a larger number of edges, which, surprisingly, has revealed to be far from simple. In this paper we investigate such a problem by following a new and elementary approach. We start from the simple observation that the incircle of a right triangle touches its hypothenuse in a point that splits it into two segments, the product of whose lengths equals the area of the triangle. From this curious fact we derive in a few lines: an unusual proof of the Pythagoras' theorem, Heron's theorem for right triangles, Heron's theorem for general triangles, and Brahmagupta's theorem for cyclic quadrangles. This suggests that cutting the edges of a cyclic polygon by means of suitable points should be the "right" working method. Indeed, following this idea, we obtain an explicit formula for the area of any convex cyclic polygon, as a symmetric function of the segments split on its edges by the incircles of a triangulation. We also show that such a symmetry can be rediscovered in Heron's and Brahmagupta's results, which consequently represent special cases of the general provided formula.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paolo Dulio, Enrico Laeng. 2019-10-17. A "right" path to cyclic polygons. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO