Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1910.14276

Faster Energy Maximization for Faster Maximum Flow

Yang P. Liu·Aaron Sidford
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we provide an algorithm which given any $m$-edge $n$-vertex directed graph with integer capacities at most $U$ computes a maximum $s$-$t$ flow for any vertices $s$ and $t$ in $m^{11/8+o(1)}U^{1/4}$ time with high probability. This running time improves upon the previous best of $\tilde{O}(m^{10/7} U^{1/7})$ (M\k{a}dry 2016), $\tilde{O}(m \sqrt{n} \log U)$ (Lee Sidford 2014), and $O(mn)$ (Orlin 2013) when the graph is not too dense or has large capacities. We achieve this result by leveraging recent advances in solving undirected flow problems on graphs. We show that in the maximum flow framework of (M\k{a}dry 2016) the problem of optimizing the amount of perturbation of the central path needed to maximize energy and thereby reduce congestion can be efficiently reduced to a smoothed $\ell_2$-$\ell_p$ flow optimization problem, which can be solved approximately via recent work (Kyng, Peng, Sachdeva, Wang 2019). Leveraging this new primitive, we provide a new long-step interior point method for maximum flow with faster convergence and simpler analysis that no longer needs global potential functions involving energy as in previous methods (M\k{a}dry 2013, M\k{a}dry 2016).

Explore related subjects

cs.DSmath.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yang P. Liu, Aaron Sidford. 2019-10-31. Faster Energy Maximization for Faster Maximum Flow. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.14276

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗