SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1911.01824

Nonparametric Quantile Regressions for Panel Data Models with Large T

Abstract

This paper considers panel data models where the conditional quantiles of the dependent variables are additively separable as unknown functions of the regressors and the individual effects. We propose two estimators of the quantile partial effects while controlling for the individual heterogeneity. The first estimator is based on local linear quantile regressions, and the second is based on local linear smoothed quantile regressions, both of which are easy to compute in practice. Within the large T framework, we provide sufficient conditions under which the two estimators are shown to be asymptotically normally distributed. In particular, for the first estimator, it is shown that $N<<T^{2/(d+4)}$ is needed to ignore the incidental parameter biases, where $d$ is the dimension of the regressors. For the second estimator, we are able to derive the analytical expression of the asymptotic biases under the assumption that $N\approx Th^{d}$, where $h$ is the bandwidth parameter in local linear approximations. Our theoretical results provide the basis of using split-panel jackknife for bias corrections. A Monte Carlo simulation shows that the proposed estimators and the bias-correction method perform well in finite samples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liang Chen. 2019-11-05. Nonparametric Quantile Regressions for Panel Data Models with Large T. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01824

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM