SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1911.01956

Parallel Approximate Undirected Shortest Paths Via Low Hop Emulators

Abstract

We present a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate parallel algorithm for computing shortest paths in undirected graphs, achieving $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ depth and $m\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ work for $n$-nodes $m$-edges graphs. Although sequential algorithms with (nearly) optimal running time have been known for several decades, near-optimal parallel algorithms have turned out to be a much tougher challenge. For $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation, all prior algorithms with $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ depth perform at least $\Omega(mn^{c})$ work for some constant $c>0$. Improving this long-standing upper bound obtained by Cohen (STOC'94) has been open for $25$ years. We develop several new tools of independent interest. One of them is a new notion beyond hopsets --- low hop emulator --- a $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$-approximate emulator graph in which every shortest path has at most $O(\log\log n)$ hops (edges). Direct applications of the low hop emulators are parallel algorithms for $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$-approximate single source shortest path (SSSP), Bourgain's embedding, metric tree embedding, and low diameter decomposition, all with $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ depth and $m\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ work. To boost the approximation ratio to $(1+\varepsilon)$, we introduce compressible preconditioners and apply it inside Sherman's framework (SODA'17) to solve the more general problem of uncapacitated minimum cost flow (a.k.a., transshipment problem). Our algorithm computes a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate uncapacitated minimum cost flow in $\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ depth using $m\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$ work. As a consequence, it also improves the state-of-the-art sequential running time from $m\cdot 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$ to $m\mathrm{poly}(\log n)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandr Andoni, Clifford Stein, Peilin Zhong. 2019-11-05. Parallel Approximate Undirected Shortest Paths Via Low Hop Emulators. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01956

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS