SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1911.03297

Structural Parameterizations for Equitable Coloring

Abstract

An $n$-vertex graph is equitably $k$-colorable if there is a proper coloring of its vertices such that each color is used either $\left\lfloor n/k \right\rfloor$ or $\left\lceil n/k \right\rceil$ times. While classic Vertex Coloring is fixed parameter tractable under well established parameters such as pathwidth and feedback vertex set, Equitable Coloring is $\mathsf{W}[1]$-$\mathsf{hard}$. We present an extensive study of structural parameterizations of Equitable Coloring, tackling both tractability and kernelization questions. We begin by showing that the problem is fixed parameter tractable when parameterized by distance to cluster or by distance to co-cluster -- improving on the $\mathsf{FPT}$ algorithm of Fiala et al. [Theoretical Computer Science, 2011] parameterized by vertex cover -- and also when parameterized by distance to disjoint paths of bounded length. To justify the latter result, we adapt a proof of Fellows et al. [Information and Computation, 2011] to show that Equitable Coloring is $\mathsf{W}[1]$-$\mathsf{hard}$ when simultaneously parameterized by distance to disjoint paths and number of colors. In terms of kernelization, on the positive side we present a linear kernel for the distance to clique parameter and a cubic kernel when parameterized by the maximum leaf number; on the other hand, we show that, unlike Vertex Coloring, Equitable Coloring does not admit a polynomial kernel when jointly parameterized by vertex cover and number of colors, unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\mathsf{poly}$. We also revisit the literature and derive other results on the parameterized complexity of the problem through minor reductions or other observations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Guilherme C. M. Gomes, Matheus R. Guedes, Vinicius F. dos Santos. 2019-11-08. Structural Parameterizations for Equitable Coloring. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03297

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS