Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1911.07234

Approximation of Steiner Forest via the Bidirected Cut Relaxation

Ali Çivril
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The classical algorithm of Agrawal, Klein and Ravi [SIAM J. Comput., 24 (1995), pp. 440-456], stated in the setting of the primal-dual schema by Goemans and Williamson [SIAM J. Comput., 24 (1995), pp. 296-317] uses the undirected cut relaxation for the Steiner forest problem. Its approximation ratio is $2-\frac{1}{k}$, where $k$ is the number of terminal pairs. A variant of this algorithm more recently proposed by K\"onemann et al. [SIAM J. Comput., 37 (2008), pp. 1319-1341] is based on the lifted cut relaxation. In this paper, we continue this line of work and consider the bidirected cut relaxation for the Steiner forest problem, which lends itself to a novel algorithmic idea yielding the same approximation ratio as the classical algorithm. In doing so, we introduce an extension of the primal-dual schema in which we run two different phases to satisfy connectivity requirements in both directions. This reveals more about the combinatorial structure of the problem. In particular, there are examples on which the classical algorithm fails to give a good approximation, but the new algorithm finds a near-optimal solution.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ali Çivril. 2019-11-17. Approximation of Steiner Forest via the Bidirected Cut Relaxation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-019-00444-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗