Pfaffian Pairs and Parities: Counting on Linear Matroid Intersection and Parity Problems

Kazuki Matoya; Taihei Oki

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1912.00620

Pfaffian Pairs and Parities: Counting on Linear Matroid Intersection and Parity Problems

Kazuki Matoya·Taihei Oki

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Spanning trees are a representative example of linear matroid bases that are efficiently countable. Perfect matchings of Pfaffian bipartite graphs are a countable example of common bases of two matrices. Generalizing these two examples, Webb (2004) introduced the notion of Pfaffian pairs as a pair of matrices for which counting of their common bases is tractable via the Cauchy-Binet formula. This paper studies counting on linear matroid problems extending Webb's work. We first introduce "Pfaffian parities" as an extension of Pfaffian pairs to the linear matroid parity problem, which is a common generalization of the linear matroid intersection problem and the matching problem. We enumerate combinatorial examples of Pfaffian pairs and parities. The variety of the examples illustrates that Pfaffian pairs and parities serve as a unified framework of efficiently countable discrete structures. Based on this framework, we derive celebrated counting theorems, such as Kirchhoff's matrix-tree theorem, Tutte's directed matrix-tree theorem, the Pfaffian matrix-tree theorem, and the Lindstr\"om-Gessel-Viennot lemma. Our study then turns to algorithmic aspects. We observe that the fastest randomized algorithms for the linear matroid intersection and parity problems by Harvey (2009) and Cheung-Lau-Leung (2014) can be derandomized for Pfaffian pairs and parities. We further present polynomial-time algorithms to count the number of minimum-weight solutions on weighted Pfaffian pairs and parities. Our algorithms make use of Frank's weight splitting lemma for the weighted matroid intersection problem and the algebraic optimality criterion of the weighted linear matroid parity problem given by Iwata-Kobayashi (2017).

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.CO math.OC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kazuki Matoya, Taihei Oki. 2019-12-02. Pfaffian Pairs and Parities: Counting on Linear Matroid Intersection and Parity Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.00620

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗