SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1912.03824

Approximating the Determinant of Well-Conditioned Matrices by Shallow Circuits

Abstract

The determinant can be computed by classical circuits of depth $O(\log^2 n)$, and therefore it can also be computed in classical space $O(\log^2 n)$. Recent progress by Ta-Shma [Ta13] implies a method to approximate the determinant of Hermitian matrices with condition number $κ$ in quantum space $O(\log n + \log κ)$. However, it is not known how to perform the task in less than $O(\log^2 n)$ space using classical resources only. In this work, we show that the condition number of a matrix implies an upper bound on the depth complexity (and therefore also on the space complexity) for this task: the determinant of Hermitian matrices with condition number $κ$ can be approximated to inverse polynomial relative error with classical circuits of depth $\tilde O(\log n \cdot \log κ)$, and in particular one can approximate the determinant for sufficiently well-conditioned matrices in depth $\tilde{O}(\log n)$. Our algorithm combines Barvinok's recent complex-analytic approach for approximating combinatorial counting problems [Bar16] with the Valiant-Berkowitz-Skyum-Rackoff depth-reduction theorem for low-degree arithmetic circuits [Val83].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Enric Boix-Adserà, Lior Eldar, Saeed Mehraban. 2019-12-09. Approximating the Determinant of Well-Conditioned Matrices by Shallow Circuits. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03824

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS