Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1912.12409

Online Rainbow Coloring In Graphs

Debasis Dwibedy·Rakesh Mohanty·Arun Khamari
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Rainbow coloring is a special case of edge coloring, where there must be at least one path between every distinct pair of vertices that consists of different color edges. Here, we may use the same color for the adjacent edges of a graph representing two different paths from a single vertex. In online rainbow coloring, we have no priori knowledge about the vertices and edges of the graph, in fact the edges are available one by one. We have to color an edge as soon as it arrives and before the arrival of the next edge. We can not revoke the coloring decision once it is made. According to our knowledge, there is no study of online rainbow coloring for graphs. In this paper, we make a first attempt to propose an online algorithm named Least Recently Used Color(LRUC) for online rainbow coloring. We analyze the performance of LRUC through competitive analysis. We show that LRUC is optimal for line graph, tree and star graph. For 1-cyclic graph, LRUC is shown to be (2-2/n)-competitive, where n>3. We obtain the competitive ratios of (n-1)/3 and n-1 for wheel and complete graphs respectively, where n is the number of vertices.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Debasis Dwibedy, Rakesh Mohanty, Arun Khamari. 2019-12-28. Online Rainbow Coloring In Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗