SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2001.01289

Equivalences between Non-trivial Variants of 3LDT and Conv3LDT

Abstract

The popular 3SUM conjecture states that there is no strongly subquadratic time algorithm for checking if a given set of integers contains three distinct elements $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $x_1+x_2=x_3$. A closely related problem is to check if a given set of integers contains distinct elements satisfying $x_1+x_2=2x_3$. This can be reduced to 3SUM in almost-linear time, but surprisingly a reverse reduction establishing 3SUM hardness was not known. We provide such a reduction, thus resolving an open question of Erickson. In fact, we consider a more general problem called 3LDT parameterized by integer parameters $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3$ and $t$. In this problem, we need to check if a given set of integers contains distinct elements $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $\alpha_1 x_1+\alpha_2 x_2 +\alpha_3 x_3 = t$. We prove that all non-trivial variants of 3LDT over the same universe $[-n^c,n^c]$ for some $c\geq2$ are equivalent under subquadratic reductions. The main technical tool used in our proof is an application of the famous Behrend's construction that partitions a given set of integers into few subsets that avoid a chosen linear equation. We extend our results to Conv3LDT and show that for all $c\geq2$, all non-trivial variants of 3LDT over the universe $[-n^c,n^c]$ and of Conv3LDT over the universe $[-n^{c-1},n^{c-1}]$ are subquadratic-equivalent, so in particular they are all equivalent to 3SUM under subquadratic reductions. Finally, we show how to apply the methods of Fischer et al. to show that we can reduce non-trivial variant of 3LDT (Conv3LDT) over an arbitrary universe to the same variant over cubic (quadratic) universe.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bartłomiej Dudek, Paweł Gawrychowski, Tatiana Starikovskaya. 2020-01-05. Equivalences between Non-trivial Variants of 3LDT and Conv3LDT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS