SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2001.06159

A New Fairness Model based on User's Objective for Multi-user Multi-processor Online Scheduling

Abstract

Resources of a multi-user system in multi-processor online scheduling are shared by competing users in which fairness is a major performance criterion for resource allocation. Fairness ensures equality in resource sharing among the users. According to our knowledge, fairness based on the user's objective has neither been comprehensively studied nor a formal fairness model has been well defined in the literature. This motivates us to explore and define a new model to ensure algorithmic fairness with quantitative performance measures based on optimization of the user's objective. In this paper, we propose a new model for fairness in Multi-user Multi-processor Online Scheduling Problem(MUMPOSP). We introduce and formally define quantitative fairness measures based on user's objective by optimizing makespan for individual user in our proposed fairness model. We also define the unfairness of deprived users and absolute fairness of an algorithm. We obtain lower bound results for the absolute fairness for m identical machines with equal length jobs. We show that our proposed fairness model can serve as a framework for measuring algorithmic fairness by considering various optimality criteria such as flow time and sum of completion times.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Debasis Dwibedy, Rakesh Mohanty. 2020-01-17. A New Fairness Model based on User's Objective for Multi-user Multi-processor Online Scheduling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.06159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS