Closed form distance formula for the balanced multiple travelling salesmen

Wolfgang Garn

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2001.07749

Closed form distance formula for the balanced multiple travelling salesmen

Wolfgang Garn

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As a first contribution the mTSP is solved using an exact method and two heuristics, where the number of nodes per route is balanced. The first heuristic uses a nearest node approach and the second assigns the closest vehicle (salesman). A comparison of heuristics with test-instances being in the Euclidean plane showed similar solution quality and runtime. On average, the nearest node solutions are approximately one percent better. The closest vehicle heuristic is especially important when the nodes (customers) are not known in advance, e.g. for online routing. Whilst the nearest node is preferable when one vehicle has to be used multiple times to service all customers. The second contribution is a closed form formula that describes the mTSP distance dependent on the number of vehicles and customers. Increasing the number of salesman results in an approximately linear distance growth for uniformly distributed nodes in a Euclidean grid plane. The distance growth is almost proportional to the square root of number of customers (nodes). These two insights are combined in a single formula. The minimum distance of a node to $n$ uniformly distributed random (real and integer) points was derived and expressed as functional relationship dependent on the number of vehicles. This gives theoretical underpinnings and is in agreement with the distances found via the previous mTSP heuristics. Hence, this allows to compute all expected mTSP distances without the need of running the heuristics.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Wolfgang Garn. 2020-01-21. Closed form distance formula for the balanced multiple travelling salesmen. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.07749

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗