Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2001.10037

Approximations for Throughput Maximization

Dylan Hyatt-Denesik·Mirmahdi Rahgoshay·Mohammad R. Salavatipour
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we study the classical problem of throughput maximization. In this problem we have a collection $J$ of $n$ jobs, each having a release time $r_j$, deadline $d_j$, and processing time $p_j$. They have to be scheduled non-preemptively on $m$ identical parallel machines. The goal is to find a schedule which maximizes the number of jobs scheduled entirely in their $[r_j,d_j]$ window. This problem has been studied extensively (even for the case of $m=1$). Several special cases of the problem remain open. Bar-Noy et al. [STOC1999] presented an algorithm with ratio $1-1/(1+1/m)^m$ for $m$ machines, which approaches $1-1/e$ as $m$ increases. For $m=1$, Chuzhoy-Ostrovsky-Rabani [FOCS2001] presented an algorithm with approximation with ratio $1-\frac{1}{e}-\varepsilon$ (for any $\varepsilon>0$). Recently Im-Li-Moseley [IPCO2017] presented an algorithm with ratio $1-1/e-\varepsilon_0$ for some absolute constant $\varepsilon_0>0$ for any fixed $m$. They also presented an algorithm with ratio $1-O(\sqrt{\log m/m})-\varepsilon$ for general $m$ which approaches 1 as $m$ grows. The approximability of the problem for $m=O(1)$ remains a major open question. Even for the case of $m=1$ and $c=O(1)$ distinct processing times the problem is open (Sgall [ESA2012]). In this paper we study the case of $m=O(1)$ and show that if there are $c$ distinct processing times, i.e. $p_j$'s come from a set of size $c$, then there is a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximation that runs in time $O(n^{mc^7\varepsilon^{-6}}\log T)$, where $T$ is the largest deadline. Therefore, for constant $m$ and constant $c$ this yields a PTAS. Our algorithm is based on proving structural properties for a near optimum solution that allows one to use a dynamic programming with pruning.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dylan Hyatt-Denesik, Mirmahdi Rahgoshay, Mohammad R. Salavatipour. 2020-01-27. Approximations for Throughput Maximization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗