Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2001.10801

Fully-Dynamic All-Pairs Shortest Paths: Improved Worst-Case Time and Space Bounds

Maximilian Probst Gutenberg·Christian Wulff-Nilsen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a directed weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ undergoing vertex insertions \emph{and} deletions, the All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) problem asks to maintain a data structure that processes updates efficiently and returns after each update the distance matrix to the current version of $G$. In two breakthrough results, Italiano and Demetrescu [STOC '03] presented an algorithm that requires $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ \emph{amortized} update time, and Thorup showed in [STOC '05] that \emph{worst-case} update time $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ can be achieved. In this article, we make substantial progress on the problem. We present the following new results: (1) We present the first deterministic data structure that breaks the $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ worst-case update time bound by Thorup which has been standing for almost 15 years. We improve the worst-case update time to $\tilde{O}(n^{2+5/7}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.71..})$ and to $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/5}) = \tilde{O}(n^{2.6})$ for unweighted graphs. (2) We present a simple deterministic algorithm with $\tilde{O}(n^{2+3/4})$ worst-case update time ($\tilde{O}(n^{2+2/3})$ for unweighted graphs), and a simple Las-Vegas algorithm with worst-case update time $\tilde{O}(n^{2+2/3})$ ($\tilde{O}(n^{2 + 1/2})$ for unweighted graphs) that works against a non-oblivious adversary. Both data structures require space $\tilde{O}(n^2)$. These are the first exact dynamic algorithms with truly-subcubic update time \emph{and} space usage. This makes significant progress on an open question posed in multiple articles [COCOON'01, STOC '03, ICALP'04, Encyclopedia of Algorithms '08] and is critical to algorithms in practice [TALG '06] where large space usage is prohibitive. Moreover, they match the worst-case update time of the best previous algorithms and the second algorithm improves upon a Monte-Carlo algorithm in a weaker adversary model with the same running time [SODA '17].

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-Nilsen. 2020-01-29. Fully-Dynamic All-Pairs Shortest Paths: Improved Worst-Case Time and Space Bounds. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975994.156

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗