arXiv · 2003.12893
Theory of the splay nematic phase: Single vs. double splay
Abstract
Recent experiments have reported a novel splay nematic phase, which has alternating domains of positive and negative splay. To model this phase, previous studies have considered a 1D splay modulation of the director field, accompanied by a 1D modulation of polar order. When the flexoelectric coupling between splay and polar order becomes sufficiently strong, the uniform nematic state becomes unstable to the formation of a modulated phase. Here, we re-examine this theory in terms of a new approach to liquid crystal elasticity, which shows that pure splay deformation is double splay rather than planar single splay. Following that reasoning, we propose a structure with a 2D splay modulation of the director field, accompanied by a 2D modulation of polar order, and show that the 2D structure generally has a lower free energy than the 1D structure.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Michely P. Rosseto, Jonathan V. Selinger. 2020-03-28. Theory of the splay nematic phase: Single vs. double splay. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.101.052707
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.