SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2003.13585

Parallel Batch-Dynamic $k$-Clique Counting

Abstract

In this paper, we study new batch-dynamic algorithms for the $k$-clique counting problem, which are dynamic algorithms where the updates are batches of edge insertions and deletions. We study this problem in the parallel setting, where the goal is to obtain algorithms with low (polylogarithmic) depth. Our first result is a new parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm with $O(\Delta\sqrt{\Delta+m})$ amortized work and $O(\log^* (\Delta+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O(\Delta+m)$ space for a batch of $\Delta$ edge insertions or deletions. Our second result is an algebraic algorithm based on parallel fast matrix multiplication. Assuming that a parallel fast matrix multiplication algorithm exists with parallel matrix multiplication constant $\omega_p$, the same algorithm solves dynamic $k$-clique counting with $O\left(\min\left(\Delta m^{\frac{(2k - 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}, (\Delta+m)^{\frac{2(k + 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}\right)\right)$ amortized work and $O(\log (\Delta+m))$ depth with high probability, and $O\left((\Delta+m)^{\frac{2(k + 1)\omega_p}{3(\omega_p + 1)}}\right)$ space. Using a recently developed parallel $k$-clique counting algorithm, we also obtain a simple batch-dynamic algorithm for $k$-clique counting on graphs with arboricity $\alpha$ running in $O(\Delta(m+\Delta)\alpha^{k-4})$ expected work and $O(\log^{k-2} n)$ depth with high probability, and $O(m + \Delta)$ space. Finally, we present a multicore CPU implementation of our parallel batch-dynamic triangle counting algorithm. On a 72-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our implementation achieves 36.54--74.73x parallel speedup, and in certain cases achieves significant speedups over existing parallel algorithms for the problem, which are not theoretically-efficient.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Laxman Dhulipala, Quanquan C. Liu, Julian Shun, Shangdi Yu. 2020-03-30. Parallel Batch-Dynamic $k$-Clique Counting. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.13585

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS