Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.01231

Towards PTAS for Precedence Constrained Scheduling via Combinatorial Algorithms

Shi Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the classic problem of scheduling $n$ precedence constrained unit-size jobs on $m = O(1)$ machines so as to minimize the makespan. In a recent breakthrough, Levey and Rothvoss \cite{LR16} developed a $(1+ε)$-approximation for the problem with running time $\exp\Big(\exp\Big(O\big(\frac{m^2}{ε^2}\log^2\log n\big)\Big)\Big)$, via the Sherali-Adams lift of the basic linear programming relaxation for the problem by $\exp\Big(O\big(\frac{m^2}{ε^2}\log^2\log n\big)\Big)$ levels. Garg \cite{Garg18} recently improved the number of levels to $\log ^{O(m^2/ε^2)}n$, and thus the running time to $\exp\big(\log ^{O(m^2/ε^2)}n\big)$, which is quasi-polynomial for constant $m$ and $ε$. In this paper we present an algorithm that achieves $(1+ε)$-approximation for the problem with running time $n^{O\left(\frac{m^4}{ε^3}\log^3\log n\right)}$, which is very close to a polynomial for constant $m$ and $ε$. Unlike the algorithms of Levey-Rothvoss and Garg, which are based on linear-programming hierarchy, our algorithm is purely combinatorial. For this problem, we show that the conditioning operations on the lifted LP solution can be replaced by making guesses about the optimum schedule.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shi Li. 2020-04-27. Towards PTAS for Precedence Constrained Scheduling via Combinatorial Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01231

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗