arXiv · 2004.02934
Response to Comment on "Reexamining $f(R,T)$ Gravity''
Abstract
Harko and Moraes claim that in $f(R,T)$ gravity with $f(R,T)=f_1(R)+f_2(T)$, the term $f_2(T)$ cannot be incorporated in the matter Lagrangian ${\cal L}_m$. A careful examination of their Comment finds that they have made several dubious assumptions without indicating any errors in our work. Most notably, they have unjustifiably claimed that the two terms ${\cal L}_m$ and $f_2(T)$ are of ``different origin,'' and their inference that only the first contributes to the energy momentum tensor is arbitrary. Also significant, their derivation of equations of motion from a Lagrangian formulation, imposing conservation constraints {\it ad hoc} rather than via Lagrange multipliers, leads to inconsistent conclusions.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Sarah B. Fisher, Eric D. Carlson. 2020-04-06. Response to Comment on "Reexamining $f(R,T)$ Gravity''. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.101.108502
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.