Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2004.05961

Non-clairvoyant Scheduling of Coflows

Akhil Bhimaraju·Debanuj Nayak·Rahul Vaze
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The coflow scheduling problem is considered: given an input/output switch with each port having a fixed capacity, find a scheduling algorithm that minimizes the weighted sum of the coflow completion times respecting the port capacities, where each flow of a coflow has a demand per input/output port, and coflow completion time is the finishing time of the last flow of the coflow. The objective of this paper is to present theoretical guarantees on approximating the sum of coflow completion time in the non-clairvoyant setting, where on a coflow arrival, only the number of flows, and their input-output port is revealed, while the critical demand volumes for each flow on the respective input-output port is unknown. The main result of this paper is to show that the proposed BlindFlow algorithm is $8p$-approximate, where $p$ is the largest number of input-output port pairs that a coflow uses. This result holds even in the online case, where coflows arrive over time and the scheduler has to use only causal information. Simulations reveal that the experimental performance of BlindFlow is far better than the theoretical guarantee.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.NI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Akhil Bhimaraju, Debanuj Nayak, Rahul Vaze. 2020-04-13. Non-clairvoyant Scheduling of Coflows. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05961

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗