SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2004.07572

Centralized, Parallel, and Distributed Multi-Source Shortest Paths via Hopsets and Rectangular Matrix Multiplication

Abstract

Consider an undirected weighted graph $G = (V,E,w)$. We study the problem of computing $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate shortest paths for $S \times V$, for a subset $S \subseteq V$ of $|S| = n^r$ sources, for some $0 < r \le 1$. We devise a significantly improved algorithm for this problem in the entire range of parameter $r$, in both the classical centralized and the parallel (PRAM) models of computation, and in a wide range of $r$ in the distributed (Congested Clique) model. Specifically, our centralized algorithm for this problem requires time $\tilde{O}(|E| \cdot n^{o(1)} + n^{\omega(r)})$, where $n^{\omega(r)}$ is the time required to multiply an $n^r \times n$ matrix by an $n \times n$ one. Our PRAM algorithm has polylogarithmic time $(\log n)^{O(1/\rho)}$, and its work complexity is $\tilde{O}(|E| \cdot n^\rho + n^{\omega(r)})$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\rho >0$. In particular, for $r \le 0.313\ldots$, our centralized algorithm computes $S \times V$ $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate shortest paths in $n^{2 + o(1)}$ time. Our PRAM polylogarithmic-time algorithm has work complexity $O(|E| \cdot n^\rho + n^{2+o(1)})$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\rho >0$. Previously existing solutions either require centralized time/parallel work of $O(|E| \cdot |S|)$ or provide much weaker approximation guarantees. In the Congested Clique model, our algorithm solves the problem in polylogarithmic time for $|S| = n^r$ sources, for $r \le 0.655$, while previous state-of-the-art algorithms did so only for $r \le 1/2$. Moreover, it improves previous bounds for all $r > 1/2$. For unweighted graphs, the running time is improved further to $poly(\log\log n)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Ofer Neiman. 2020-04-16. Centralized, Parallel, and Distributed Multi-Source Shortest Paths via Hopsets and Rectangular Matrix Multiplication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS