arXiv · 2004.07814
Economic Conditions for Innovation: Private vs. Public Sector
Abstract
The Hicks induced innovation hypothesis states that a price increase of a production factor is a spur to invention. We propose an alternative hypothesis restating that a spur to invention require not only an increase of one factor but also a decrease of at least one other factor to offset the companies' cost. We illustrate the need for our alternative hypothesis in a historical example of the industrial revolution in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, we econometrically evaluate both hypotheses in a case study of research and development (R&D) in 29 OECD countries from 2003 to 2017. Specifically, we investigate dependence of investments to R&D on economic environment represented by average wages and oil prices using panel regression. We find that our alternative hypothesis is supported for R&D funded and/or performed by business enterprises while the original Hicks hypothesis holds for R&D funded by the government and R&D performed by universities. Our results reflect that business sector is significantly influenced by market conditions, unlike the government and higher education sectors.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Tomáš Evan, Vladimír Holý. 2020-04-15. Economic Conditions for Innovation: Private vs. Public Sector. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100966
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.