SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2004.11761

Incompressibility of H-free edge modification problems: Towards a dichotomy

Abstract

Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the $H$-free Edge Editing problem is to find whether there exists at most $k$ pairs of vertices in $G$ such that changing the adjacency of the pairs in $G$ results in a graph without any induced copy of $H$. The existence of polynomial kernels for $H$-free Edge Editing received significant attention in the parameterized complexity literature. Nontrivial polynomial kernels are known to exist for some graphs $H$ with at most 4 vertices, but starting from 5 vertices, polynomial kernels are known only if $H$ is either complete or empty. This suggests the conjecture that there is no other $H$ with at least 5 vertices were $H$-free Edge Editing admits a polynomial kernel. Towards this goal, we obtain a set $\mathcal{H}$ of nine 5-vertex graphs such that if for every $H\in\mathcal{H}$, $H$-free Edge Editing is incompressible and the complexity assumption $NP \not\subseteq coNP/poly$ holds, then $H$-free Edge Editing is incompressible for every graph $H$ with at least five vertices that is neither complete nor empty. That is, proving incompressibility for these nine graphs would give a complete classification of the kernelization complexity of $H$-free Edge Editing for every $H$ with at least 5 vertices. We obtain similar result also for $H$-free Edge Deletion. Here the picture is more complicated due to the existence of another infinite family of graphs $H$ where the problem is trivial (graphs with exactly one edge). We obtain a larger set $\mathcal{H}$ of nineteen graphs whose incompressibility would give a complete classification of the kernelization complexity of $H$-free Edge Deletion for every graph $H$ with at least 5 vertices. Analogous results follow also for the $H$-free Edge Completion problem by simple complementation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dániel Marx, R. B. Sandeep. 2020-04-24. Incompressibility of H-free edge modification problems: Towards a dichotomy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.11761

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS