SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2005.01582

Implementation of the ADMM to Parabolic Optimal Control Problems with Control Constraints and Beyond

Abstract

Parabolic optimal control problems with control constraints are generally challenging, from either theoretical analysis or algorithmic design perspectives. Conceptually, the well-known alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) can be directly applied to such a problem. An attractive advantage of this direct ADMM application is that the control constraint can be untied from the parabolic PDE constraint; these two inherently different constraints thus can be treated individually in iterations. At each iteration of the ADMM, the main computation is for solving an unconstrained parabolic optimal control problem. Because of its high dimensionality after discretization, the unconstrained parabolic optimal control problem at each iteration can be solved only inexactly by implementing certain numerical scheme internally and thus a two-layer nested iterative scheme is required. It then becomes important to find an easily implementable and efficient inexactness criterion to execute the internal iterations, and to prove the overall convergence rigorously for the resulting two-layer nested iterative scheme. To implement the ADMM efficiently, we propose an inexactness criterion that is independent of the mesh size of the involved discretization, and it can be executed automatically with no need to set empirically perceived constant accuracy a prior. The inexactness criterion turns out to allow us to solve the resulting unconstrained optimal control problems to medium or even low accuracy and thus saves computation significantly, yet convergence of the overall two-layer nested iterative scheme can be still guaranteed rigorously. Efficiency of this ADMM implementation is promisingly validated by preliminary numerical results. Our methodology can also be extended to a range of optimal control problems constrained by other linear PDEs such as elliptic equations and hyperbolic equations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yongcun Song, Xiaoming Yuan, Hangrui Yue. 2020-05-04. Implementation of the ADMM to Parabolic Optimal Control Problems with Control Constraints and Beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01582

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deterministic and Random Bipartite Matching on General Networks: Convex Flow Reformulation, Asymptotic Properties, and Fast Algorithms

Minimum-distance bipartite matching on general networks has numerous applications various fields. This paper first focuses on deterministic problems and presents an exact edgewise-separable convex-flow reformulation. By introducing a smooth monotone rearrangement approximation of the edge-wise imbalance profiles, the convex-flow reformulation's can be solved efficiently. If we further conduct a first-order resistance-based approximation of the convex program, a one-step Laplacian-based estimator can be analytically derived in closed forms. The paper also studies random problems where supply and demand points are randomly distributed. We show that the expected optimal matching distance scales with the square root of the number of points if the supply/demand point distributions are identical, or linearly otherwise. In the former case, the optimal flow is proven to be centered, symmetric, and sub-Gaussian. In the latter case, the limiting resistance network characterizes how supply-demand imbalance is redistributed and motivates a fast algorithm that approximate the optimal flow based on the limiting resistance. Numerical experiments show that the proposed estimators closely approximate the exact matching cost while substantially reducing computation time. The proven theoretical properties of the random matching solution are numerically verified by large-scale Monte Carlo simulations.

math.OC

Conformal-DRO: Distributionally Robust Optimization with Conformalized Ambiguity Set

Data-driven distributionally robust optimization (DRO) typically treats the conditional outcome law as fixed and uses ambiguity sets to capture estimation error. This paper studies latent distributional heterogeneity, where each instance has an unobserved law but contributes only one observation, so uncertainty persists even if the mixture law is known. We propose Conformal-DRO, which uses nested conformal regions to construct an ambiguity set for the future latent law. Under exchangeability, the set covers this law with probability at least $1-\alpha$ in finite samples, without estimating underlying latent laws or their mixing mechanism. The conformal path induces a data-driven transport geometry, while $\alpha$ determines the radius. The worst-case problem reduces to a finite linear program over conformal shells and admits sparse adversarial solutions. The resulting robust value provides a finite-sample certificate for the selected decision's expected cost.

math.OC

The best approximation tuple: an extension of the Cheney-Goldstein algorithm and results to the multiple sets case

In this paper we extend the algorithm and several results published in the celebrated 1959 paper of Cheney and Goldstein about the best approximation pair (BAP) problem in two separate directions. One is the consideration of more than two sets. The other is the ability to handle each set as an intersections of a finite family of sets. We call the resulting problem the "Best Approximation Tuple (BAT) problem". The fundamental observation that leads to this generalizations is to recognize and handle one set (the "pivot set") as different from the remaining sets (the "satellite sets") instead of seeking cycles as the minimizers of a target functional. This enable us to overcome a certain theoretical obstacle related to cycles and minimizers of general functionals. We prove the convergence of the algorithm to the unique solution of the problem in the Euclidean case with strictly convex and compact satellite sets. Because of the lack of Fej\'er monotonicity, our convergence analysis is not standard, and is based on almost unknown properties of orthogonal projections regarding equality and inequality in the definition of nonexpansiveness.

math.OC