SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2005.02064

Degree 5 polynomials and Descartes' rule of signs

Abstract

For a univariate real polynomial without zero coefficients, Descartes' rule of signs (completed by an observation of Fourier) says that its numbers $pos$ of positive and $neg$ of negative roots (counted with multiplicity) are majorized respectively by the numbers $c$ and $p$ of sign changes and sign preservartions in the sequence of its coefficients, and that the differences $c-pos$ and $p-neg$ are even numbers. For degree 5 polynomials, it has been proved by A.~Albouy and Y.~Fu that there exist no such polynomials having three distinct positive and no negative roots and whose signs of the coefficients are $(+,+,-,+,-,-)$ (or having three distinct negative and no positive roots and whose signs of the coefficients are $(+,-,-,-,-,+)$). For degree 5 and when the leading coefficient is positive, these are all cases of numbers of positive and negative roots (all distinct) and signs of the coefficients which are compatible with Descartes' rule of signs, but for which there exist no such polynomials. We explain this non-existence and the existence in all other cases with $d=5$ by means of pictures showing the discriminant set of the family of polynomials $x^5+x^4+ax^3+bx^2+cx+d$ together with the coordinate axes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hassen Cheriha, Yousra Gati, Vladimir Petrov Kostov. 2020-05-05. Degree 5 polynomials and Descartes' rule of signs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On the log-concavity of the composite Bessel function $x^{\alpha}J_{\nu }\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $

For a twice differentiable function $f:\left( a,b\right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ define $v\left( f\right) =f^{\prime}f^{\prime}-f^{\prime\prime }f.$ It is well known that the positivity of $v\left( f\right) $ implies that the function $\left\vert f\right\vert $ is strictly log-concave on each subinterval which does not contain zeros of $f.$ In this paper we provide criteria for the positivity of $v\left( F\right) $ for the composite Bessel function $F\left( x\right) =J_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\nu}\left( x\right) :=x^{\alpha}J_{\nu}\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $ for positive numbers $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and real numbers $\alpha$ and $\nu.$

math.CA

Riesz capacity ratios with negative exponents

We investigate sharp inequalities for ratios of Riesz capacities with negative exponents by combining computational experiments with rigorous analysis. For finite subsets of the line, we prove positivity of equilibrium masses when $-1<p<0$, enabling numerical tests of conjectured extremal ratios. In the plane, comparisons of the disk with regular polygon vertex sets reveal a cascade of transitions among the tested competitors and suggest a precise conjecture for the equilibrium measure of odd polygons, for which we give a partial proof. Numerical intersections of equality curves show that the regions where these sets outperform the disk are not simply nested. Similar numerical intersections occur in three dimensions between the regular-simplex equality curve and those of explicit five-point and six-point configurations. Motivated by the dimensional dependence of these comparisons, we prove that for each fixed $p<-2<q<0$, the regular simplex has a larger capacity ratio than the ball in all sufficiently large dimensions. Accompanying Python and Mathematica code supports reproduction and further testing of the conjectures.

math.CA

Shorter proof of dimension-free $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms

We provide a shorter and more direct proof of $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms (of an arbitrary order) in terms of the corresponding Riesz transforms, with a constant independent of the dimension of the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$. This result was originally proved by Mateu, Orobitg, P\'erez and Verdera with a constant depending on the dimension, and improved to a dimension-free inequality by Kucharski, Wr\'obel and Zienkiewicz.

math.CA