Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2005.04203

Equaliza\c{c}\~ao das escalas NESSCA e SARA utilizando a Teoria da Resposta ao Item na avalia\c{c}\~ao do comprometimento pela doen\c{c}a de Machado-Joseph

Nicole Machado Utpott·Vanessa Bielefeldt Leotti·Laura Bannach Jardim
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background: Scale equating is a statistical technique used to establish equivalence relations between different scales. Its use is quite popular in educational evaluation, however, unusual in the health area, where scales of measures are tools that integrate clinical practice. With the use of different scales, there is a difficulty in comparing scientific results, such as NESSCA and SARA scales, tools for assessing the commitment to Machado-Joseph disease (SCA3/MJD). Objective: Explore the method of scale equating and demonstrate its application through NESSCA and SARA scales, using the Item Response Theory (IRT) approach in assessing SCA3/MJD commitment. Methods: Data came from 227 patients from the Hospital de Cl\'inicas de Porto Alegre with SCA3/MJD who have complete measures for NESSCA and/or SARA scales. The equating design used is that of non-equivalent groups with common items, with separate calibration. The IRT model used in the estimation of the parameters was the generalized partial credit, for NESSCA and SARA. The linear transformation was performed using the Mean/Mean, Mean/Sigma, Haebara and StokingLord methods and the equation of the true score was applied to obtain an estimated relationship between the scores of the scales. Results: Difference between NESSCA score estimated by SARA and observed NESSCA score has shown median of 0.82 points, by Mean/Sigma method. This was the best method of linear transformation among the tested. Conclusions: This study extended the use of scale equating under IRT approach to health outcomes and established an equivalence relationship between NESSCA and SARA scores, making the comparison between patients and scientific results feasible.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.QM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicole Machado Utpott, Vanessa Bielefeldt Leotti, Laura Bannach Jardim. 2020-04-24. Equaliza\c{c}\~ao das escalas NESSCA e SARA utilizando a Teoria da Resposta ao Item na avalia\c{c}\~ao do comprometimento pela doen\c{c}a de Machado-Joseph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04203

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Biology-in-the-loop: Amortized Adaptive Hit Discovery in CRISPR Screens

Many biological discovery problems require experiments to be selected sequentially under constrained budgets. CRISPR screening is a prominent example, as exhaustive perturbation testing is often infeasible and candidate perturbations must instead be prioritized over multiple experimental rounds. Despite the importance of this problem, existing benchmarks for adaptive hit discovery remain limited in scale and diversity. Here, we introduce AssayBench-Loop, a large-scale benchmark for adaptive hit discovery comprising 1,389 CRISPR screens across five phenotype categories. Beyond enabling systematic evaluation, its scale makes it possible to learn acquisition strategies across historical experiments. Building on this resource, we introduce AssayLoop, a sequential experimental design framework combining AssayFormer, a transformer-based amortized acquisition policy trained across historical screens to adapt from experimental feedback, with LLM-derived biological priors through an adaptive handoff. In this view, completed experiments become training data for learning how accumulated evidence should guide what to test next, while LLMs provide prior biological knowledge to seed the search. We further introduce AssayLLM, showing that the same principle can be extended directly to an LLM through task-specific post-training. On temporally held-out screens, AssayLoop achieves a 5.67-fold enrichment over random selection and recovers 27.7% of hits after assaying approximately 5% of the candidate library, outperforming existing adaptive-design methods and standalone LLMs, and AssayFormer alone. Performance improves with increasing historical training data and transfers to phenotype categories excluded from training. These results demonstrate the value of learning acquisition policies across historical experiments and combining them with broad biological priors for efficient adaptive hit discovery.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

Multi-Task Bacterial Colony Detection and Classification Using YOLOv8 with Edge Optimization for Resource-Constrained Deployment

Manual counting and classification of bacterial colonies are critical yet labor-intensive tasks in microbiology, prone to human error particularly on densely populated plates. This work proposes a multi-task deep learning framework trained on the Annotated Germs for Automated Recognition (AGAR) dataset (18,000 images; 9,202 training / 3,067 testing) to automate Colony Forming Unit (CFU) enumeration and species classification. A custom multi-task CNN employing global regression served as the baseline, but demonstrated limited performance in clustered colony environments due to the absence of spatial localization. To address this, a YOLOv8 object detection architecture was adopted with high-resolution 1024x1024 inputs, enabling instance-level colony detection and label assignment. The model achieved a classification accuracy of 98.13% and a counting accuracy of 98.27% (within a 10-colony margin), demonstrating strong predictive capability. To bridge the gap between model performance and practical deployability, the trained model was optimized through unstructured and structured pruning, ONNX conversion, and reduced-precision inference (FP32, FP16, INT8). On a Raspberry Pi 4B, ONNX FP32 and FP16 variants offered the best balance between inference speed (~6.4s) and accuracy (MAE ~2.20). Unstructured pruning preserved predictive accuracy (MAE ~2.01) without runtime gains, while structured pruning resulted in significant accuracy degradation (MAE ~6.3), revealing the sensitivity of instance-level colony detection to architectural compression. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting optimization strategies in resource-constrained laboratory deployments.

q-bio.QM↗
arXiv2026

ADMET-EvO: a self-evolving scientific agent for sustained research across heterogeneous tasks

Scientific agents can move beyond automated model building by using accumulated evidence to revise both their questions and experimental strategies. The challenge is sustaining this adaptation across heterogeneous tasks without overfitting decisions to internal validation. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) prediction provides a demanding setting across diverse assays, datasets and chemical domains. We therefore developed ADMET-EvO, an evidence-gated agent that formalizes endpoints, generates falsifiable hypotheses and tests interventions across data, feature and model axes. It carries supported, rejected and inconclusive outcomes forward to guide each new cycle. Across the 22-task Therapeutics Data Commons (TDC) ADMET benchmark, ADMET-EvO achieved the highest task-normalized score of 96.77. Evidence-guided selection reduced cumulative fitting time by 72.2% within a predefined non-inferiority margin. It also formalized 43 toxicity-related tasks and constructed endpoint-specific predictors. Together, these results show how ADMET-EvO can accumulate evidence, revise its strategy and expand its research scope over time.

q-bio.QM↗