SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2005.09262

Multiple Source Replacement Path Problem

Abstract

One of the classical line of work in graph algorithms has been the Replacement Path Problem: given a graph $G$, $s$ and $t$, find shortest paths from $s$ to $t$ avoiding each edge $e$ on the shortest path from $s$ to $t$. These paths are called replacement paths in literature. For an undirected and unweighted graph, (Malik, Mittal, and Gupta, Operation Research Letters, 1989) and (Hershberger and Suri, FOCS 2001) designed an algorithm that solves the replacement path problem in $\tilde O(m+n)$ time. It is natural to ask whether we can generalize the replacement path problem: {\em can we find all replacement paths from a source $s$ to all vertices in $G$?} This problem is called the Single Source Replacement Path Problem. Recently (Chechik and Cohen, SODA 2019) designed a randomized combinatorial algorithm that solves the Single Source Replacement Path Problem in $\tilde O(m\sqrt n\ + n^2)$ time. One of the questions left unanswered by their work is the case when there are many sources, not one. When there are $n$ sources, the combinatorial algorithm of (Bernstein and Karger, STOC 2009) can be used to find all pair replacement path in $\tilde O(mn + n^3)$ time. However, there is no result known for any general $\sigma$. Thus, the problem we study is defined as follows: given a set of $\sigma$ sources, we want to find the replacement path from these sources to all vertices in $G$. We give a randomized combinatorial algorithm for this problem that takes $\tilde O(m\sqrt{n \sigma} +\ \sigma n^2)$ time. This result generalizes both results known for this problem. Our algorithm is much different and arguably simpler than (Chechik and Cohen, SODA 2019). Like them, we show a matching conditional lower bound using the Boolean Matrix Multiplication conjecture.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manoj Gupta, Rahul Jain, Nitiksha Modi. 2020-05-19. Multiple Source Replacement Path Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.09262

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS