Entropy Martingale Optimal Transport and Nonlinear Pricing-Hedging Duality

Alessandro Doldi; Marco Frittelli

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2005.12572

Entropy Martingale Optimal Transport and Nonlinear Pricing-Hedging Duality

Alessandro Doldi·Marco Frittelli

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop a duality between a novel Entropy Martingale Optimal Transport problem (A) and an associated optimization problem (B). In (A) we follow the approach taken in the Entropy Optimal Transport (EOT) primal problem by Liero et al. "Optimal entropy-transport problems and a new Hellinger-Kantorovic distance between positive measures", Invent. math. 2018, but we add the constraint, typical of Martingale Optimal Transport (MOT) theory, that the infimum of the cost functional is taken over martingale probability measures, instead of finite positive measures, as in Liero et al.. The Problem (A) differs from the corresponding problem in Liero et al. not only by the martingale constraint, but also because we admit less restrictive penalization terms $\mathcal{D}_{U}$, which may not have a divergence formulation. In Problem (B) the objective functional, associated via Fenchel conjugacy to the terms $\mathcal{D}_{U}$, is not any more linear, as in OT or in MOT. This leads to a novel optimization problem which also has a clear financial interpretation as a nonlinear subhedging value. Our theory allows us to establish a nonlinear robust pricing-hedging duality, which covers a wide range of known robust results. We also focus on Wasserstein-induced penalizations and we study how the duality is affected by variations in the penalty terms, with a special focus on the convergence of EMOT to the extreme case of MOT.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.MF math.PR

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Alessandro Doldi, Marco Frittelli. 2020-05-26. Entropy Martingale Optimal Transport and Nonlinear Pricing-Hedging Duality. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Variance-Optimal Hedging in the Rough Hawkes--Heston Model

We study variance-optimal stock hedging and the convergence of approximate strategies in the rough Hawkes--Heston model. Starting from the model's affine conditional transform and the affine Volterra jump framework, we obtain semi-explicit hedges for European calls and a representation of the minimum quadratic error through the Galtchouk--Kunita--Watanabe projection. Our main approximation result keeps the original stock, variance driver, and information flow fixed while regularizing the kernel used to evaluate the hedge. To handle singular memory and common marked jumps, we construct the approximate holdings from histories available before trading and preserve the conditional transform's random modulus envelope. Riccati--Volterra stability and weighted truncation then yield convergence in the original stock's trading norm on compact Fourier intervals. For calls, a joint choice of kernel regularization and Fourier cutoff gives convergence of the initial capitals and strategies, uniform-in-time square-mean convergence of continuous-time gains, and convergence of the terminal mean-square error to the variance-optimal value. A numerical experiment with shifted fractional kernels illustrates the construction on common original-market paths.

q-fin.MF↗

arXiv2026

Numeraire Invariance of Entropy-Projected Martingale Measures

Let $P$ be a fixed physical law and let $Q$ be an equivalent martingale measure selected from the martingale-measure set associated with a chosen numeraire. A change of numeraire maps $Q$ to $T_LQ$, where $d(T_LQ)=L\,dQ$ and $L$ is the terminal likelihood ratio. The forward relative-entropy projection minimizing $D_{\mathrm{KL}}(P\Vert Q)$ commutes with this transform because its objective changes only by the constant $-E_P\log L$. The minimal entropy martingale measure (MEMM) orientation $D_{\mathrm{KL}}(Q\Vert P)$ does not have this property, and a trinomial counterexample shows that independently recomputed MEMMs need not be likelihood compatible. We make two economic consequences explicit. First, the two entropy orientations are precisely the $Q$-dependent terms in the classical convex-dual objectives for logarithmic and exponential utility, respectively. Second, likelihood compatibility is equivalent to equality of the pricing functionals obtained in the two numeraires. Hence the forward selectors value every integrable claim consistently across numeraires, whereas the two MEMMs in the counterexample assign different prices to a nonreplicable digital claim. We also prove a finite-state class-level characterization: uniform invariance over the elementary one-period likelihood-ratio families forces a smooth convex $f$-divergence to be logarithmic, up to scaling and affine equivalence. Finally, in finite-state markets, the forward projection exists under the usual strictly positive feasible-point condition; its density $dP/dQ^*$ is attainable log-optimal terminal wealth, and the minimum forward entropy equals maximal expected log growth.

q-fin.MF↗

arXiv2026

The Delta of a Variance Swap

We define the variance swap delta as the sensitivity of the price of variance to a change in underlying price. We use Carr-Madan spanning formulas to analyze this sensitivity when the implied volatility smile curve may depend on the underlying price. We show that the variance swap total delta is zero for the class of smile curves that are pure functions of (log) moneyness, which goes against the empirical observation that variance is up when the market is down. We propose a simple modification of the smile to correct this issue.

q-fin.MF↗