SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2006.02408

Dynamic Longest Common Substring in Polylogarithmic Time

Abstract

The longest common substring problem consists in finding a longest string that appears as a (contiguous) substring of two input strings. We consider the dynamic variant of this problem, in which we are to maintain two dynamic strings $S$ and $T$, each of length at most $n$, that undergo edit operations, i.e., substitutions, insertions, and deletions of letters, in order to be able to return a longest common substring after each edit. Amir, Charalampopoulos, Pissis, and Radoszewski [Algorithmica 2020] presented a solution for this problem that requires $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{2/3})$ time per update. This brought the challenge of determining whether there exists a solution with polylogarithmic update time or we should expect a polynomial (conditional) lower bound. We answer this question by designing an exponentially faster algorithm that processes each edit operation in amortized $O(\log^7 n)$ time with high probability. Our solution relies on exploiting the local consistency of the parsing of a collection of dynamic strings due to Gawrychowski, Karczmarz, Kociumaka, L\k{a}cki, and Sankowski [SODA 2018], and on maintaining two dynamic trees with labeled bicolored leaves. We complement our solution with a lower bound of $\Omega(\log n/ \log\log n)$ for the update time of any polynomial-size data structure that maintains an LCS of two dynamic strings, and the same lower bound for the update time of any $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n)$-size data structure that maintains the LCS of a static and a dynamic string. Both lower bounds hold even allowing amortization and randomization. This requires extending P\u{a}tra\c{s}cu's reduction from the lopsided set disjointness problem to the butterfly reachability problem [SICOMP 2011].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Paweł Gawrychowski, Karol Pokorski. 2020-06-03. Dynamic Longest Common Substring in Polylogarithmic Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02408

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS