SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2006.02541

Testing Finite Moment Conditions for the Consistency and the Root-N Asymptotic Normality of the GMM and M Estimators

Abstract

Common approaches to inference for structural and reduced-form parameters in empirical economic analysis are based on the consistency and the root-n asymptotic normality of the GMM and M estimators. The canonical consistency (respectively, root-n asymptotic normality) for these classes of estimators requires at least the first (respectively, second) moment of the score to be finite. In this article, we present a method of testing these conditions for the consistency and the root-n asymptotic normality of the GMM and M estimators. The proposed test controls size nearly uniformly over the set of data generating processes that are compatible with the null hypothesis. Simulation studies support this theoretical result. Applying the proposed test to the market share data from the Dominick's Finer Foods retail chain, we find that a common \textit{ad hoc} procedure to deal with zero market shares in analysis of differentiated products markets results in a failure to satisfy the conditions for both the consistency and the root-n asymptotic normality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuya Sasaki, Yulong Wang. 2020-06-03. Testing Finite Moment Conditions for the Consistency and the Root-N Asymptotic Normality of the GMM and M Estimators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.02541

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM