SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.01194

Risk Management and Return Prediction

Abstract

With the good development in the financial industry, the market starts to catch people's eyes, not only by the diversified investing choices ranging from bonds and stocks to futures and options but also by the general "high-risk, high-reward" mindset prompting people to put money in the financial market. People are interested in reducing risk at a given level of return since there is no way of having both high returns and low risk. Many researchers have been studying this issue, and the most pioneering one is Harry Markowitz's Modern Portfolio Theory developed in 1952, which is the cornerstone of investment portfolio management and aims at "maximum the return at the given risk". In contrast to that, fifty years later, E. Robert Fernholz's Stochastic Portfolio Theory, as opposed to the normative assumption served as the basis of earlier modern portfolio theory, is consistent with the observable characteristics of actual portfolios and markets. In this paper, after introducing some basic theories of Markowitz's MPT and Fernholz's SPT, then we step across to the application side, trying to figure out under four basic models based on Markowitz Efficient Frontier, including Markowitz Model, Constant Correlation Model, Single Index Model, and Multi-Factor Model, which portfolios will be selected and how do these portfolios perform in the real world. Here we also involve universal Portfolio Algorithmby Thomas M. Cover to select portfolios as a comparison. Besides, each portfolio value at Risk, Expected Shortfall, and corresponding bootstrap confidence interval for risk management will be evaluated. Finally, by utilizing factor analysis and time series models, we could predict the future performance of our four models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qingyin Ge, Yunuo Ma, Yuezhi Liao, Rongyu Li, Tianle Zhu. 2020-06-28. Risk Management and Return Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01194

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AI for AI: Optimizing Additional Infrastructure Build-out to Power Artificial Intelligence Data Centers

The twenty-first century's transformative technology, artificial intelligence, is increasingly constrained by the twentieth century's transformative technology, the electricity grid. Rapid growth in electricity demand from data centers is leading to higher electricity prices, without a compensating supply-side response. We develop a framework linking data-center load growth, available generation capacity, and market-clearing prices to understand this phenomenon. We first analyze a deterministic model to show how differing estimates of demand and supply growth rates affect prices. We then model the expansion of new data centers and their associated electricity demand, together with build-outs of new electricity supply, as stochastic processes,resulting in probabilistic distributions of supply, demand, and prices rather than a single forecast. Finally, we formulate generation expansion as a stochastic control problem in which a revenue-maximizing investor dynamically chooses the intensity of supply-side investments. The analysis highlights a central challenge of the data-center build-out: even when rapid demand growth increases the need for new generation, the uncertainties related to load forecasts, development execution risks, and value cannibalization from overbuilding capacity may weaken incentives to invest at the pace required to keep electricity prices stable.

q-fin.GN

Measuring DeFi Risk

Decentralized finance (DeFi) lending has grown from nonexistent in 2017 to nearly 40 billion US Dollars in deposited funds in May 2022. Using cryptocurrency as collateral, the platforms match speculative margin trading with yield-seeking depositors lending coins pegged to the dollar (stable coins). Depositors receive claims guaranteed by a basket of collateral, akin to new stable coins. We develop a framework requiring only knowledge of aggregate deposits and borrowings to measure overall system risks to lenders and borrowers. Using evidence from major protocols, the measures identify an increase in system fragility beyond prudent levels around mid 2021, with a potential loss of peg for extreme variations in coin prices. Overall, the model offers an easily implementable aggregate risk metric capturing the perspectives of synthetic investors and offers early warning signals as the industry is moving from deposits guaranteed by collateral to fiat money.

q-fin.GN

Historical Reflections on Interest Rates and the Emergence of the Yield Curve

This text grew out of a historical introduction initially written for a study of interest rates in cryptocurrency markets. The difficulty of defining a term structure for a currency without a conventional bond market led naturally to a more fundamental question: under what historical conditions does a yield curve become observable at all? Credit existed long before modern money, and interest-bearing loans are documented as early as ancient Mesopotamia. For much of history, the surviving evidence lacks the institutional features that facilitate reliable comparisons of interest rates by maturity: standardised debt instruments, sufficiently homogeneous borrowers, regular issuance over a range of maturities, observable market prices, and liquid secondary markets. We trace the gradual emergence of these conditions from ancient Mesopotamia, Greece, and Rome, through medieval and early modern Europe, to the development of modern sovereign debt markets in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

q-fin.GN