Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2007.01445

Minimizing Convex Functions with Rational Minimizers

Haotian Jiang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a separation oracle $\mathsf{SO}$ for a convex function $f$ defined on $\mathbb{R}^n$ that has an integral minimizer inside a box with radius $R$, we show how to find an exact minimizer of $f$ using at most (a) $O(n (n \log \log (n)/\log (n) + \log(R)))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\mathsf{poly}(n, \log(R))$ arithmetic operations, or (b) $O(n \log(nR))$ calls to $\mathsf{SO}$ and $\exp(O(n)) \cdot \mathsf{poly}(\log(R))$ arithmetic operations. When the set of minimizers of $f$ has integral extreme points, our algorithm outputs an integral minimizer of $f$. This improves upon the previously best oracle complexity of $O(n^2 (n + \log(R)))$ for polynomial time algorithms and $O(n^2\log(nR))$ for exponential time algorithms obtained by [Grötschel, Lovász and Schrijver, Prog. Comb. Opt. 1984, Springer 1988] over thirty years ago. Our improvement on Grötschel, Lovász and Schrijver's result generalizes to the setting where the set of minimizers of $f$ is a rational polyhedron with bounded vertex complexity. For the Submodular Function Minimization problem, our result immediately implies a strongly polynomial algorithm that makes at most $O(n^3 \log \log (n)/\log (n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle, and an exponential time algorithm that makes at most $O(n^2 \log(n))$ calls to an evaluation oracle. These improve upon the previously best $O(n^3 \log^2(n))$ oracle complexity for strongly polynomial algorithms given in [Lee, Sidford and Wong, FOCS 2015] and [Dadush, Végh and Zambelli, SODA 2018], and an exponential time algorithm with oracle complexity $O(n^3 \log(n))$ given in the former work. Our result is achieved via a reduction to the Shortest Vector Problem in lattices. We analyze its oracle complexity using a potential function that simultaneously captures the size of the search set and the density of the lattice.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DMcs.ITmath.ITmath.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Haotian Jiang. 2022-09-20. Minimizing Convex Functions with Rational Minimizers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01445

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗