Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2007.04778

Shoulder abduction loading affects motor coordination in individuals with chronic stroke, informing targeted rehabilitation

Aleksandra Kalinowska·Kyra Rudy·Millicent Schlafly·Kathleen Fitzsimons·Julius P Dewald·Todd D Murphey
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Individuals post stroke experience motor impairments, such as loss of independent joint control, leading to an overall reduction in arm function. Their motion becomes slower and more discoordinated, making it difficult to complete timing-sensitive tasks, such as balancing a glass of water or carrying a bowl with a ball inside it. Understanding how the stroke-induced motor impairments interact with each other can help design assisted training regimens for improved recovery. In this study, we investigate the effects of abnormal joint coupling patterns induced by flexion synergy on timing-sensitive motor coordination in the paretic upper limb. We design a virtual ball-in-bowl task that requires fast movements for optimal performance and implement it on a robotic system, capable of providing varying levels of abduction loading at the shoulder. We recruit 12 participants (6 individuals with chronic stroke and 6 unimpaired controls) and assess their skill at the task at 3 levels of loading, defined by the vertical force applied at the robot end-effector. Our results show that, for individuals with stroke, loading has a significant effect on their ability to generate quick coordinated motion. With increases in loading, their overall task performance decreases and they are less able to compensate for ball dynamics---frequency analysis of their motion indicates that abduction loading weakens their ability to generate movements at the resonant frequency of the dynamic task. This effect is likely due to an increased reliance on lower resolution indirect motor pathways in individuals post stroke. Given the inter-dependency of loading and dynamic task performance, we can create targeted robot-aided training protocols focused on improving timing-sensitive motor control, similar to existing progressive loading therapies, which have shown efficacy for expanding reachable workspace post stroke.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aleksandra Kalinowska, Kyra Rudy, Millicent Schlafly, Kathleen Fitzsimons, Julius P Dewald, Todd D Murphey. 2020-06-05. Shoulder abduction loading affects motor coordination in individuals with chronic stroke, informing targeted rehabilitation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04778

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗