SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.07718

On Indexing and Compressing Finite Automata

Abstract

An index for a finite automaton is a powerful data structure that supports locating paths labeled with a query pattern, thus solving pattern matching on the underlying regular language. In this paper, we solve the long-standing problem of indexing arbitrary finite automata. Our solution consists in finding a partial co-lexicographic order of the states and proving, as in the total order case, that states reached by a given string form one interval on the partial order, thus enabling indexing. We provide a lower bound stating that such an interval requires $O(p)$ words to be represented, $p$ being the order's width (i.e. the size of its largest antichain). Indeed, we show that $p$ determines the complexity of several fundamental problems on finite automata: (i) Letting $\sigma$ be the alphabet size, we provide an encoding for NFAs using $\lceil\log \sigma\rceil + 2\lceil\log p\rceil + 2$ bits per transition and a smaller encoding for DFAs using $\lceil\log \sigma\rceil + \lceil\log p\rceil + 2$ bits per transition. This is achieved by generalizing the Burrows-Wheeler transform to arbitrary automata. (ii) We show that indexed pattern matching can be solved in $\tilde O(m\cdot p^2)$ query time on NFAs. (iii) We provide a polynomial-time algorithm to index DFAs, while matching the optimal value for $ p $. On the other hand, we prove that the problem is NP-hard on NFAs. (iv) We show that, in the worst case, the classic powerset construction algorithm for NFA determinization generates an equivalent DFA of size $2^p(n-p+1)-1$, where $n$ is the number of NFA's states.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicola Cotumaccio, Nicola Prezza. 2020-07-15. On Indexing and Compressing Finite Automata. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07718

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS