SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.08051

Information Theoretic Limits of Cardinality Estimation: Fisher Meets Shannon

Abstract

Estimating the cardinality (number of distinct elements) of a large multiset is a classic problem in streaming and sketching. In this paper we study the intrinsic tradeoff between the space complexity of the sketch and its estimation error. We define a new measure of efficiency for data sketches called the Fisher-Shannon (FiSh) number $\mathcal{H}/\mathcal{I}$. It captures the tension between the limiting Shannon entropy ($\mathcal{H}$) of the sketch and its normalized Fisher information ($\mathcal{I}$) that characterizes the variance of a statistically efficient, asymptotically unbiased estimator. Our aim in introducing the FiSh-number is to build the mathematical machinery necessary to argue for precise optimality, rather than asymptotic optimality, up to large constant factors. Our results are as follows. [1] We prove that all base-$q$ variants of Flajolet and Martin's PCSA sketch have FiSh-number $H_0/I_0 \approx 1.98016$ and that every base-$q$ variant of HyperLogLog has FiSh-number worse than $H_0/I_0$, but that they tend to $H_0/I_0$ in the limit as $q\rightarrow \infty$. Here $H_0,I_0$ are precisely defined constants. [2] We describe a sketch called Fishmonger that is based on a smoothed, entropy-compressed variant of PCSA with a different estimator function. Fishmonger processes a multiset of $[U]$ such that at all times, w.h.p., its space is $(1+o(1))(H_0/I_0)m \approx 1.98m$ bits and its standard error is $1/\sqrt{m}$. For example, to achieve a 1% standard error, one needs a little more than 19,800 bits, or $\approx 2.42$ kilobytes. [3] Finally, we give circumstantial evidence that $H_0/I_0$ is the optimum FiSh-number of mergeable sketches for Cardinality Estimation. We define a natural subset of mergeable sketches called linearizable sketches and prove that no member of this class can beat $H_0/I_0$. The popular mergeable sketches are, in fact, also linearizable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Seth Pettie, Dingyu Wang. 2020-07-16. Information Theoretic Limits of Cardinality Estimation: Fisher Meets Shannon. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.08051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS