Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2007.10470

Modular and Submodular Optimization with Multiple Knapsack Constraints via Fractional Grouping

Yaron Fairstein·Ariel Kulik·Hadas Shachnai
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A multiple knapsack constraint over a set of items is defined by a set of bins of arbitrary capacities, and a weight for each of the items. An assignment for the constraint is an allocation of subsets of items to the bins which adheres to bin capacities. In this paper we present a unified algorithm that yields efficient approximations for a wide class of submodular and modular optimization problems involving multiple knapsack constraints. One notable example is a polynomial time approximation scheme for Multiple-Choice Multiple Knapsack, improving upon the best known ratio of $2$. Another example is Non-monotone Submodular Multiple Knapsack, for which we obtain a $(0.385-\varepsilon)$-approximation, matching the best known ratio for a single knapsack constraint. The robustness of our algorithm is achieved by applying a novel fractional variant of the classical linear grouping technique, which is of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yaron Fairstein, Ariel Kulik, Hadas Shachnai. 2020-07-20. Modular and Submodular Optimization with Multiple Knapsack Constraints via Fractional Grouping. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.10470

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗