Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2007.13077

Bounded Fuzzy Possibilistic Method of Critical Objects Processing in Machine Learning

Hossein Yazdani
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unsatisfying accuracy of learning methods is mostly caused by omitting the influence of important parameters such as membership assignments, type of data objects, and distance or similarity functions. The proposed method, called Bounded Fuzzy Possibilistic Method (BFPM) addresses different issues that previous clustering or classification methods have not sufficiently considered in their membership assignments. In fuzzy methods, the object's memberships should sum to 1. Hence, any data object may obtain full membership in at most one cluster or class. Possibilistic methods relax this condition, but the method can be satisfied with the results even if just an arbitrary object obtains the membership from just one cluster, which prevents the objects' movement analysis. Whereas, BFPM differs from previous fuzzy and possibilistic approaches by removing these restrictions. Furthermore, BFPM provides the flexible search space for objects' movement analysis. Data objects are also considered as fundamental keys in learning methods, and knowing the exact type of objects results in providing a suitable environment for learning algorithms. The Thesis introduces a new type of object, called critical, as well as categorizing data objects into two different categories: structural-based and behavioural-based. Critical objects are considered as causes of miss-classification and miss-assignment in learning procedures. The Thesis also proposes new methodologies to study the behaviour of critical objects with the aim of evaluating objects' movements (mutation) from one cluster or class to another. The Thesis also introduces a new type of feature, called dominant, that is considered as one of the causes of miss-classification and miss-assignments. Then the Thesis proposes new sets of similarity functions, called Weighted Feature Distance (WFD) and Prioritized Weighted Feature Distance (PWFD).

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hossein Yazdani. 2020-07-26. Bounded Fuzzy Possibilistic Method of Critical Objects Processing in Machine Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.13077

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗