SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.14111

Monadic second order limit laws for natural well orderings

Abstract

By combining classical results of B\"uchi, some elementary Tauberian theorems and some basic tools from logic and combinatorics we show that every ordinal $\alpha$ with $\varepsilon_0\geq \alpha\geq \omega^\omega$ satisfies a natural monadic second order limit law and that every ordinal $\alpha$ with $\omega^\omega>\alpha\geq \omega$ satisfies a natural monadic second order Cesaro limit law. In both cases we identify as usual $\alpha$ with the class of substructures $\{\beta:\beta<\alpha\}$. We work in an additive setting where the norm function $N$ assigns to every ordinal $\alpha$ the number of occurrrences of the symbol $\omega$ in its Cantor normal form. This number is the same as the number of edges in the tree which is canonically associated with $\alpha$. For a given $\alpha$ with $\omega\leq \alpha\leq \varepsilon_0$ the asymptotic probability of a monadic second order formula $\varphi$ from the language of linear orders is $\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\#\{\beta<\alpha: N\beta=n\wedge \beta\models \Phi\}}{\#\{\beta<\alpha: N\beta=n\}}$ if this limit exists. If this limit exists only in the Cesaro sense we speak of the Cesaro asympotic probability of $\varphi$. Moreover we prove monadic second order limit laws for the ordinal segments below below $\Gamma_0$ (where the norm function is extended appropriately) and we indicate how this paper's results can be extended to larger ordinal segments and even to certain impredicative ordinal notation systems having notations for uncountable ordinals. We also briefly indicate how to prove the corresponding multiplicative results for which the setting is defined relative to the Matula coding. The results of this paper concerning ordinals not exceeding $\varepsilon_0$ have been obtained partly in joint work with Alan R. Woods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Weiermann. 2020-07-28. Monadic second order limit laws for natural well orderings. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.14111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO