MSPP: A Highly Efficient and Scalable Algorithm for Mining Similar Pairs of Points

Subrata Saha; Ahmed Soliman; Sanguthevar Rajasekaran

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2007.16111

MSPP: A Highly Efficient and Scalable Algorithm for Mining Similar Pairs of Points

Subrata Saha·Ahmed Soliman·Sanguthevar Rajasekaran

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The closest pair of points problem or closest pair problem (CPP) is an important problem in computational geometry where we have to find a pair of points from a set of points in metric space with the smallest distance between them. This problem arises in a number of applications, such as but not limited to clustering, graph partitioning, image processing, patterns identification, and intrusion detection. For example, in air-traffic control, we must monitor aircrafts that come too close together, since this may potentially indicate a possible collision. Numerous algorithms have been presented for solving the CPP. The algorithms that are employed in practice have a worst case quadratic run time complexity. In this article we present an elegant approximation algorithm for the CPP called MSPP: Mining Similar Pairs of Points. It is faster than currently best known algorithms while maintaining a very good accuracy. The proposed algorithm also detects a set of closely similar pairs of points in Euclidean and Pearson metric spaces and can be adapted in numerous real world applications, such as clustering, dimension reduction, constructing and analyzing gene/transcript co-expression network, among others.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Subrata Saha, Ahmed Soliman, Sanguthevar Rajasekaran. 2020-07-31. MSPP: A Highly Efficient and Scalable Algorithm for Mining Similar Pairs of Points. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.16111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗