SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2007.16192

Contiguous Graph Partitioning For Optimal Total Or Bottleneck Communication

Abstract

Graph partitioning schedules parallel calculations like sparse matrix-vector multiply (SpMV). We consider contiguous partitions, where the $m$ rows (or columns) of a sparse matrix with $N$ nonzeros are split into $K$ parts without reordering. We propose the first near-linear time algorithms for several graph partitioning problems in the contiguous regime. Traditional objectives such as the simple edge cut, hyperedge cut, or hypergraph connectivity minimize the total cost of all parts under a balance constraint. Our total partitioners use $O(Km + N)$ space. They run in $O((Km\log(m) + N)\log(N))$ time, a significant improvement over prior $O(K(m^2 + N))$ time algorithms due to Kernighan and Grandjean et. al. Bottleneck partitioning minimizes the maximum cost of any part. We propose a new bottleneck cost which reflects the sum of communication and computation on each part. Our bottleneck partitioners use linear space. The exact algorithm runs in linear time when $K^2$ is $O(N^C)$ for $C < 1$. Our $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximate algorithm runs in linear time when $K\log(c_{high}/(c_{low}\epsilon))$ is $O(N^C)$ for $C < 1$, where $c_{high}$ and $c_{low}$ are upper and lower bounds on the optimal cost. We also propose a simpler $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximate algorithm which runs in a factor of $\log(c_{high}/(c_{low}\epsilon))$ from linear time. We empirically demonstrate that our algorithms efficiently produce high-quality contiguous partitions on a test suite of 42 test matrices. When $K = 8$, our hypergraph connectivity partitioner achieved a speedup of $53\times$ (mean $15.1\times$) over prior algorithms. The mean runtime of our bottleneck partitioner was 5.15 SpMVs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Willow Ahrens. 2020-07-31. Contiguous Graph Partitioning For Optimal Total Or Bottleneck Communication. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.16192

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS