arXiv · 2008.06616
Maps, Mirrors, and Participants: Design Lenses for Sociomateriality in Engineering Organizations
Abstract
When you use a computer it also uses you, and in that relationship forms a new entity of melded agencies, a "centaur" inseparably human and nonhuman. Networks of interaction in an organization similarly form "organizational centaurs", melding humans, technologies, and organizations into an inseparable sociomateriality. By developing a convex optimization toolkit for conceptual engineering we sought to shape these centaurs. How do organizations go from a high-level concept ("let's make an airplane") to a "design", and in that process what blurred lines between humans and computers bring opportunities for research? We present three metaphors that have been useful lenses across our field sites: considering design models as maps shows how centaurs apportioned legitimacy; looking at design models as mirrors illuminates how they sought validation in their perspectives; and treating design models as participants recognizes their opinions and agency as equivalent to other entities in these centaurs.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Edward Burnell, Priya P. Pillai, Maria C. Yang. 2020-08-15. Maps, Mirrors, and Participants: Design Lenses for Sociomateriality in Engineering Organizations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.06616
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.