arXiv · 2008.12827
A conflict between some semantic conditions of Carmo and Jones for contrary-to-duty obligations
Abstract
We show that Carmo and Jones' condition 5(e) conflicts with the other conditions on their models for contrary-to-duty obligations. We then propose a resolution to the conflict.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen. 2020-08-28. A conflict between some semantic conditions of Carmo and Jones for contrary-to-duty obligations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12827
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.