SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2009.06063

On Fault Tolerant Feedback Vertex Set

Abstract

The study of fault-tolerant data structures for various network design problems is a prominent area of research in computer science. Likewise, the study of NP-Complete problems lies at the heart of computer science with numerous results in algorithms and complexity. In this paper we raise the question of computing fault tolerant solutions to NP-Complete problems; that is computing a solution that can survive the "failure" of a few constituent elements. This notion has appeared in a variety of theoretical and practical settings such as estimating network reliability, kernelization (aka instance compression), approximation algorithms and so on. In this paper, we seek to highlight these questions for further research. As a concrete example, we study the fault-tolerant version of the classical Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) problem, that we call Fault Tolerant Feedback Vertex Set (FT-FVS). Recall that, in FVS the input is a graph $G$ and the objective is to compute a minimum subset of vertices $S$ such that $G-S$ is a forest. In FT-FVS, the objective is to compute a minimum subset $S$ of vertices such that $G - (S \setminus \{v\})$ is a forest for any $v \in V(G)$. Here the vertex $v$ denotes a single vertex fault. We show that this problem is NP-Complete, and then present a constant factor approximation algorithm as well as an FPT-algorithm parameterized by the solution size. We believe that the question of computing fault tolerant solutions to various NP-Complete problems is an interesting direction for future research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pranabendu Misra. 2020-09-13. On Fault Tolerant Feedback Vertex Set. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.06063

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS