SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2009.07735

On Symmetric Rectilinear Matrix Partitioning

Abstract

Even distribution of irregular workload to processing units is crucial for efficient parallelization in many applications. In this work, we are concerned with a spatial partitioning called rectilinear partitioning (also known as generalized block distribution) of sparse matrices. More specifically, in this work, we address the problem of symmetric rectilinear partitioning of a square matrix. By symmetric, we mean the rows and columns of the matrix are identically partitioned yielding a tiling where the diagonal tiles (blocks) will be squares. We first show that the optimal solution to this problem is NP-hard, and we propose four heuristics to solve two different variants of this problem. We present a thorough analysis of the computational complexities of those proposed heuristics. To make the proposed techniques more applicable in real life application scenarios, we further reduce their computational complexities by utilizing effective sparsification strategies together with an efficient sparse prefix-sum data structure. We experimentally show the proposed algorithms are efficient and effective on more than six hundred test matrices. With sparsification, our methods take less than 3 seconds in the Twitter graph on a modern 24 core system and output a solution whose load imbalance is no worse than 1%.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Abdurrahman Yaşar, Muhammed Fatih Balin, Xiaojing An, Kaan Sancak, Ümit V. Çatalyürek. 2020-09-16. On Symmetric Rectilinear Matrix Partitioning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07735

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS