arXiv · 2009.10025
Misspecification and Unreliable Interpretations in Psychology and Social Science
Abstract
The replicability crisis has drawn attention to numerous weaknesses in psychology and social science research practice. In this work we focus on three issues that cannot be addressed with replication alone, and which deserve more attention: Functional misspecification, structural misspecification, and unreliable interpretation of results. We demonstrate a number of possible consequences via simulation, and provide recommendations for researchers to improve their research practice. Psychologists and social scientists should engage with these areas of analytical and statistical improvement, as they have the potential to seriously hinder scientific progress. Every research question and hypothesis may present its own unique challenges, and it is only through an awareness and understanding of varied statistical methods for predictive and causal modeling, that researchers will have the tools with which to appropriately address them.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Matthew J. Vowels. 2020-09-21. Misspecification and Unreliable Interpretations in Psychology and Social Science. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10025
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.