SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2009.11178

Sampling an Edge Uniformly in Sublinear Time

Abstract

The area of sublinear algorithms have recently received a lot of attention. In this setting, one has to choose specific access model for the input, as the algorithm does not have time to pre-process or even to see the whole input. A fundamental question remained open on the relationship between the two common models for graphs -- with and without access to the "random edge" query -- namely whether it is possible to sample an edge uniformly at random in the model without access to the random edge queries. In this paper, we answer this question positively. Specifically, we give an algorithm solving this problem that runs in expected time $O(\frac{n}{\sqrt{m}} \log n)$. This is only a logarithmic factor slower than the lower bound given in [5]. Our algorithm uses the algorithm from [7] which we analyze in a more careful way, leading to better bounds in general graphs. We also show a way to sample edges $\epsilon$-close to uniform in expected time $O(\frac{n}{\sqrt{m}} \log \frac{1}{\epsilon})$, improving upon the best previously known algorithm. We also note that sampling edges from a distribution sufficiently close to uniform is sufficient to be able to simulate sublinear algorithms that use the random edge queries while decreasing the success probability of the algorithm only by $o(1)$. This allows for a much simpler algorithm that can be used to emulate random edge queries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jakub Tětek. 2020-09-23. Sampling an Edge Uniformly in Sublinear Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS