Hypergraph $k$-cut for fixed $k$ in deterministic polynomial time

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran; Chandra Chekuri

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2009.12442

Hypergraph $k$-cut for fixed $k$ in deterministic polynomial time

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran·Chandra Chekuri

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the Hypergraph-$k$-cut problem. The input consists of a hypergraph $G=(V,E)$ with non-negative hyperedge-costs $c: E\rightarrow R_+$ and a positive integer $k$. The objective is to find a least-cost subset $F\subseteq E$ such that the number of connected components in $G-F$ is at least $k$. An alternative formulation of the objective is to find a partition of $V$ into $k$ non-empty sets $V_1,V_2,\ldots,V_k$ so as to minimize the cost of the hyperedges that cross the partition. Graph-$k$-cut, the special case of Hypergraph-$k$-cut obtained by restricting to graph inputs, has received considerable attention. Several different approaches lead to a polynomial-time algorithm for Graph-$k$-cut when $k$ is fixed, starting with the work of Goldschmidt and Hochbaum (1988). In contrast, it is only recently that a randomized polynomial time algorithm for Hypergraph-$k$-cut was developed (Chandrasekaran, Xu, Yu, 2018) via a subtle generalization of Karger's random contraction approach for graphs. In this work, we develop the first deterministic polynomial time algorithm for Hypergraph-$k$-cut for all fixed $k$. We describe two algorithms both of which are based on a divide and conquer approach. The first algorithm is simpler and runs in $n^{O(k^2)}$ time while the second one runs in $n^{O(k)}$ time. Our proof relies on new structural results that allow for efficient recovery of the parts of an optimum $k$-partition by solving minimum $(S,T)$-terminal cuts. Our techniques give new insights even for Graph-$k$-cut.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Karthekeyan Chandrasekaran, Chandra Chekuri. 2020-09-25. Hypergraph $k$-cut for fixed $k$ in deterministic polynomial time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12442

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗